mirror of
https://github.com/godotengine/godot.git
synced 2025-01-22 10:32:54 -05:00
Merge pull request #100954 from Bromeon/bugfix/nodepath-slice
Fix `NodePath::slice()` incorrect behavior for subname indexing
This commit is contained in:
commit
ad74e337b9
2 changed files with 11 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ NodePath NodePath::slice(int p_begin, int p_end) const {
|
|||
if (end < 0) {
|
||||
end += total_count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
const int sub_begin = MAX(begin - name_count - 1, 0);
|
||||
const int sub_begin = MAX(begin - name_count, 0);
|
||||
const int sub_end = MAX(end - name_count, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
const Vector<StringName> names = get_names().slice(begin, end);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -169,28 +169,31 @@ TEST_CASE("[NodePath] Empty path") {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST_CASE("[NodePath] Slice") {
|
||||
const NodePath node_path_relative = NodePath("Parent/Child:prop");
|
||||
const NodePath node_path_relative = NodePath("Parent/Child:prop:subprop");
|
||||
const NodePath node_path_absolute = NodePath("/root/Parent/Child:prop");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(0, 2) == NodePath("Parent/Child"),
|
||||
"The slice lower bound should be inclusive and the slice upper bound should be exclusive.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(3) == NodePath(":prop"),
|
||||
"Slicing on the length of the path should return the last entry.");
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(3) == NodePath(":subprop"),
|
||||
"Slicing on the last index (length - 1) should return the last entry.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(1) == NodePath("Child:prop:subprop"),
|
||||
"Slicing without upper bound should return remaining entries after index.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(1, 3) == NodePath("Child:prop"),
|
||||
"Slicing should include names and subnames.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(-1) == NodePath(":prop"),
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(-1) == NodePath(":subprop"),
|
||||
"Slicing on -1 should return the last entry.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(0, -1) == NodePath("Parent/Child"),
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(0, -1) == NodePath("Parent/Child:prop"),
|
||||
"Slicing up to -1 should include the second-to-last entry.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(-2, -1) == NodePath("Child"),
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(-2, -1) == NodePath(":prop"),
|
||||
"Slicing from negative to negative should treat lower bound as inclusive and upper bound as exclusive.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(0, 10) == NodePath("Parent/Child:prop"),
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(0, 10) == NodePath("Parent/Child:prop:subprop"),
|
||||
"Slicing past the length of the path should work like slicing up to the last entry.");
|
||||
CHECK_MESSAGE(
|
||||
node_path_relative.slice(-10, 2) == NodePath("Parent/Child"),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue