Previously, a collection of notes (Vector or Array) would be created and
promptly deleted for every sample (at least 44 thousand times per
second!). This was measured to be one of the most significant
performance drawbacks as well as the most obvious performance
improvement I could currently find here. Although it will not cause
Piano to lag currently (at least on virtualized systems), I see an
incoming issue once we get the capability to use more processors.
Now, we use a HashMap correlating pitches to notes, and Track reuses the
data structure in order to avoid reallocations. That is the reason for
introducing the fast clear_with_capacity to HashMap.
Always throws at the moment, because parse_temporal_month_day_string()
is basically a stub, and parse_iso_date_time() isn't functional either.
The spec issue has been resolved though, so I figured we might as well
get one small step further :^)
Same as Vector, ByteBuffer now also signals allocation failure by
returning an ENOMEM Error instead of a bool, allowing us to use the
TRY() and MUST() patterns.
Instead of signalling allocation failure with a bool return value
(false), we now use ErrorOr<void> and return ENOMEM as appropriate.
This allows us to use TRY() and MUST() with Vector. :^)
It's a little verbose to repeat these in cases like the borders, but if
everything has an initial value, we can guarantee that
`property_initial_value()` will return something! :^)
- `align-items`: `normal` is the initial value in the CSS-ALIGN spec,
but `stretch` is in CSS-FLEXBOX. The FLEXBOX spec is the one we've
actually implemented elsewhere, and ALIGN adds new values with special
syntax, so it's not trivial to add it here.
- `border-spacing`: `0` is equivalent to `0px 0px` and we don't yet
parse the double-value syntax.
- `text-decoration-thickness`: Had the wrong value.
This patch introduces table joins. It uses a pretty dumb algorithm-
starting with a singleton '__unity__' row consisting of a single boolean
value, a cartesian product of all tables in the 'FROM' clause is built.
This cartesian product is then filtered through the 'WHERE' clause,
again without any smarts just using brute force.
This patch required a bunch of busy work to allow for example the
ColumnNameExpression having to deal with multiple tables potentially
having columns with the same name.
Because SQL is the craptastic language that it is, sometimes expressions
need to know details about the calling statement. For example the tables
in the 'FROM' clause may be needed to determine which columns are
referenced in 'WHERE' expressions. So the current statement is added
to the ExecutionContext and a new 'execute' overload on Statement is
created which takes the Database and the Statement and builds an
ExecutionContaxt from those.
These are needed to distinguish columns from different tables with the
same column name in one and the same (joined) Tuple. Not quite happy
yet with this API; I think some sort of hierarchical structure would be
better but we'll burn that bridge when we get there :^)
`object_name()` already returns the cleaned library name, and we
currently don't have any libraries with suffixes in /usr/lib, so we can
convert this to an `ends_with()` check.
We already asked the region about what its library name is, and we also
use that value when maybe constructing a path, so let's make the check
use that as well.
There's nothing really background-size-specific about this, but since
there is no `<size>` value type defined in the CSS spec at this time,
and background-size is the only user of it, I think this name makes more
sense. But I'm not 100% convinced.
...as opposed to storing StyleValues, which we have to later check are
IdentifierStyleValues, which store identifiers that we can convert to
Repeat values later. It's fewer allocations, and we can't end up with
invalid values by mistake. :^)
While right now this doesn't save much complexity, it will do once we
care about multiple background layers per node. Then, having a single
repeat value per layer will simplify things.
It also means we can remove the pseudo-property concept entirely! :^)
This is step 1 in removing the two `background-repeat-x/y`
pseudo-properties. Since adding the concept of compound StyleValues, we
don't need `background-repeat` to be split in two any more.
