Whenever we create a GC function, it should always be so that we can
pass it to a platform event loop spin, HTML event loop spin, or some
queued task on the HTML event loop. For every use case, any local
variables will be out of scope by the time the function executes.
Lazily coercing might have made sense in the past, but since hashing
and comparing requires the `PropertyKey` to be coerced, and since a
`PropertyKey` will be used to index into a hashmap 99% of the time,
which will hash the `PropertyKey` and use it in comparisons, the
extra complexity and branching produced by lazily coercing has
become more trouble than it is worth.
Remove the lazy coercions, which then also neatly allows us to
switch to a `Variant`-based implementation.
This includes a protocol for creating LibGC Heap allocated Swift
objects. Pay no attention to the Unmanaged shenanigans, they are
all behind the curtain.
This will allow us to use the GC to manage the lifetime of objects
that are not C++ objects, such as Swift objects. In the future we
could expand this cursed FFI to other languages as well.
While we don't want arbitrary callers deferring GC, we do want
deferral to be available to the Swift. In order for Swift to
understand the RAII nature of DeferGC, we need to mark it as
non-copyable.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
