We do this by piggybacking on FormattingContext helpers instead of
reinventing the wheel in FlexFormattingContext.
This fixes an issue where `min-width: fit-content` (and other
layout-dependent values) were treated as 0 on flex items.
This makes the cookie banners look okay on https://microsoft.com/ :^)
If an inline-block has a percentage height that relies on the auto
height of the containing block, it should always resolve to the
automatic height of the box, regardless of the percentage value. This
change may seem confusing, but it aligns with the behavior of other
engines.
There are two parts to this fix:
- First, StyleProperties::transformations() would previously omit calc()
values entirely when returning the list of transformations. This was
very confusing to StackingContext which then tried to index into the
list based on faulty assumptions. Fix this by emitting calc values.
- Second, StackingContext::get_transformation_matrix() now always calls
resolve() on length-percentages. This takes care of actually resolving
calc() values. If no reference value for percentages is provided, we
default to 0px.
This stops LibWeb from asserting on websites with calc() in transform
values, such as https://qt.io/ :^)
This change implements following paragraph from placement algorithm in
the spec:
"If the largest column span among all the items without a definite
column position is larger than the width of the implicit grid, add
columns to the end of the implicit grid to accommodate that column
span."
There were places in the grid implementation code with copies of this
text, but those were completely unrelated to the code where they were
being pasted so I removed them.
Max width shouldn't be tied to min width, commit d33b99d went too far
and made them the same when the table-root had a specified percentage
width.
Fixes#19940.
Make sure the insets and margins calculated according to the spec are
not later ignored and ad-hoc recomputed in
layout_absolutely_positioned_element.
Use the static position calculation in a couple of places where the
spec (and comment) was indicating it should be used.
Fixes#19362
The tests still pass, but opening the files in Ladybird and Safari or
Firefox shows clearly where the layouting in Ladybird is incorrect
for some absolute positioned elements. The previous 1px border was
subtly hiding some issues.
When the containing block has an indefinite width, any descendants with
a percentage size should resolve that against 0, not infinity.
Fixes an assertion failure when loading https://www.gnu.org/
When sizing under a max-content constraint, we allow flex lines to have
an infinite amount of "remaining space", but we shouldn't let infinity
leak into the geometry of items. So treat it as zero in arithmetic.
This fixes an issue where inline SVGs with natural aspect ratio (from
viewBox) but no natural width or height could get an infinite size as
flex items.
All of the following properties in the font shorthand can be `normal`:
- font-style
- font-variant
- font-weight
- font-stretch
This means that we must allow up to four consecutive `normal` at the
start of a font shorthand value.
Anonymous wrapper boxes inherit style from their layout tree parent,
and since style data is per-layout-node, we have to manually sync them
from parent to anonymous children when something changes.
This is not very elegant or efficient, so I've left a FIXME about
solving it in a nicer way.
This fixes horizontal dog alignment on https://waffles.dog/ :^)
As it turns out, Layout::TreeBuilder never managed to wrap text within
table boxes in anonymous wrapper boxes, since it relied on checking
text_for_rendering(), and that was never initialized during that early
stage of tree building.
This patch fixes the issue by making text_for_rendering() compute the
(potentially collapsed) text lazily when called.
Note that the test included with this patch is still totally wrong,
but that is now a TFC problem rather than a TreeBuilder problem. :^)
Computing the table width algorithm bifurcates based on whether
table-root width is auto. We only adjust the used table width based on
cell percentage widths on the auto branch, thus the same check is needed
when we initialize cell widths.
Cell percentage widths are relative to table width, not containing
block width. If the table width is auto, there isn't a normative
specification, only a brief mention that the user agent should try to
meet it.
As a starting point, we increase the width of the table such that it's
sufficient to cover min-width of cells with a percentage width. This
matches the behavior of other browsers, at least for simple cases.
This ensures that min-content contributions from cells with no content
are computed using their calculated values, which are never considered
for min-content before then. The specification diverges from column
measures algorithm, which doesn't use specified width of cells anywhere.
The used width is already a content width, which doesn't include
borders. Border widths should be subtracted from the specified width
instead, since that initially specifies the total width including
borders, for consistent comparison. Also handle table box padding as an
additional fix.
On style update, we have to preserve the invariant established when we
built the layout tree - some properties are applied to the table wrapper
and the table box values are reset to their initial values.
This also ensures that the containing block of a table box is always a
table wrapper, which isn't the case if we set absolute position on the
box instead of the wrapper.
Fixes#19452.
This fixes the issue when size of abspos items is considered to be
resolvable without performing layout which is not correct in the
scenarious when top/right/bottom/left properties are not auto.
Return error when input svg is not valid and SVGSVGElement is not
present in the tree instead of doing svg_root nullptr dereference.
Fixes crash on https://apps.kde.org/en-gb/
Adding undistributable space right before setting the content width is
incorrect when it's a percentage. Follow the specification and add it to
GRIDMIN and GRIDMAX instead.
In particular, in BFC:
- Non-floating, non-replaced elements
- Floating, non-replaced elements
- Floating, replaced elements
The first two regressed in 1d76126abe
The third one seems to have been introduced by this regression, as it
was seemingly copied from compute_width_for_floating_box in
7f9ede07bc
