LibWeb/CSS: Clarify comment about cascading presentational hints

The spec allows us to either treat them as part of the UA origin, or as
its own origin before author styles. This second behaviour turns out to
be what we are currently doing, which is nice!

Funnily enough this was clarified in the spec barely a month after this
original comment was written. :^)

(cherry picked from commit dcf55dd4924e5369d75a3533af2b869033a0ebfd)
This commit is contained in:
Sam Atkins 2024-09-25 15:11:48 +01:00 committed by Nico Weber
parent c369a2b48c
commit 812c55784b

View file

@ -1443,7 +1443,12 @@ void StyleComputer::compute_cascaded_values(StyleProperties& style, DOM::Element
previous_layer_style = style.clone();
cascade_declarations(style, element, pseudo_element, matching_rule_set.user_rules, CascadeOrigin::User, Important::No, previous_origin_style, previous_layer_style);
// Author presentational hints (NOTE: The spec doesn't say exactly how to prioritize these.)
// Author presentational hints
// The spec calls this a special "Author presentational hint origin":
// "For the purpose of cascading this author presentational hint origin is treated as an independent origin;
// however for the purpose of the revert keyword (but not for the revert-layer keyword) it is considered
// part of the author origin."
// https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-5/#author-presentational-hint-origin
previous_origin_style = style.clone();
if (!pseudo_element.has_value()) {
element.apply_presentational_hints(style);